ProSolvr logo

Resolve problems, permanently

Catastrophic Explosion and Fire at TPC Group Port Neches Operations: Root Cause Analysis

Root Cause Analysis of Catastrophic Explosion and Fire at TPC Group Port Neches Operations

The TPC explosion in Port Neches, Texas, occurred in November 2019, leading to extensive damage, injuries, and environmental impact. To prevent similar incidents in the future, a Root Cause Analysis (RCA) was conducted. RCA is a systematic process used to identify the fundamental causes of an event or problem.

The RCA revealed several critical issues contributing to the explosion. One key finding was the failure to address ongoing issues with popcorn polymer formation in the facility's processing unit. This formation can lead to equipment rupture, which was a significant factor in this incident. This emphasizes the importance of proactive monitoring and maintenance to prevent such issues.

Inadequate containment measures for storing and handling flammable butadiene were identified as a contributing factor. The release of 6,000 gallons of butadiene formed a vapor cloud that ignited and exploded, causing the initial blast and subsequent fires. Proper containment and monitoring systems could have detected the leak early and prevented the situation from escalating.

In response to the findings from the RCA, Corrective and Preventive Actions (CAPA) were recommended to address the identified root causes and improve safety measures. CAPA involves implementing corrective actions to fix immediate issues and preventive actions to prevent recurrence. This approach aligns with Six Sigma methodologies, focusing on continuous improvement and reducing variability in processes.

Moving forward, it is essential for petrochemical facilities to prioritize safety, invest in preventive maintenance, and foster a culture of accountability to safeguard workers, communities, and the environment. The lessons learned from this tragic incident should serve as a catalyst for industry-wide improvements, ensuring that such disasters are prevented to protect lives and preserve the environment.

  • Man
    • Communication
      • Lack of clear communication channels
      • Poor communication during emergency events
    • Staffing
      • Insufficient monitoring and maintenance staff
      • Understaffing and overworked employees
    • Training
      • Insufficient emergency response training
      • Inadequate chemical handling training
    • Experience
      • Lack of seasoned personnel
      • Inexperienced staff in critical roles

  • Machine
    • Monitoring systems
      • Lack of real-time equipment status tracking
      • Ineffective leak detection and monitoring
    • Design flaws
      • Inadequate safety features on critical equipment
      • Equipment design not accounting for failure modes
    • Equipment age
      • Outdated equipment incapable of current demands
      • Aging infrastructure not meeting safety standards
    • Maintenance
      • Lack of preventive maintenance schedules
      • Deferred maintenance leading to failures

  • Material
    • Material containment
      • Unaddressed risks in storage and transfer
      • Inadequate measures to prevent spills
    • Material quality control
      • Failure to verify chemical purity before use
      • Insufficient quality control for incoming materials
    • Equipment materials
      • Corrosion due to chemical exposure
      • Use of unsuitable materials for handling chemical
    • Material compatibility
      • Failure to segregate hazardous materials
      • Mixing of incompatible materials leading to reactions

  • Method
    • Compliance monitoring
      • Inadequate regulatory oversight
      • Non-compliance with regulations
    • Process monitoring
      • Inadequate monitoring systems
      • Failure to detect abnormalities
    • Maintenance practices
      • Lack of preventive maintenance
      • Deferred equipment maintenance
    • Emergency response
      • Inefficient coordination with emergency services
      • Delayed response to incidents

  • Environment
    • Location
      • Lack of safety barriers or containment measures
      • Proximity to residential areas increasing impact
    • Weather conditions
      • Failure to account for environmental factors
      • Adverse weather exacerbating risks
    • Community impact
      • Injuries to workers and residents
      • Evacuation of 60,000 people
    • Environmental impact
      • Water contamination in canals leading to Neches River
      • Air pollution with elevated butadiene and VOC levels
    • Regulatory compliance
      • Release of flammable butadiene forming vapor cloud
      • Presence of carcinogenic 1,3-butadiene

The TPC Port Neches Explosions and Fire incident highlights the pressing need for rigorous root cause analysis and robust corrective actions to prevent such catastrophic events. Through comprehensive investigation and the adoption of the suggested improvements, the facility can bolster safety protocols, safeguard the community, and minimize the chances of recurrence. This fishbone analysis offers a structured approach for TPC to fortify its operational integrity, rebuild trust with the community, and uphold environmental stewardship. Implementing these insights will pave the way for safer operations, enhanced regulatory compliance, and a resilient response to future challenges.

Who should use the TPC Port Neches Explosions and Fire template?

This template for a detailed Root Cause Analysis (RCA) report on the Moss Landing Power Plant oil spill is designed for various stakeholders involved in the incident and its aftermath. Here's a list of potential users who could benefit from using this template: